FALAFEL vs CHEDDAR BACON RANCH CHICKEN SNACKERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHEDDAR BACON RANCH CHICKEN SNACKERS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
FALAFEL: 4
vs
CHEDDAR BACON RANCH CHICKEN SNACKERS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FALAFEL | CHEDDAR BACON RANCH CHICKEN SNACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 271 cal | 219 cal | |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 14.1 g | |
| Carbs | 25 g | 10.9 g | |
| Fat | 15.6 g | 14.1 g | |
| Fiber | 1 g | 1.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FALAFEL | CHEDDAR BACON RANCH CHICKEN SNACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FALAFEL | CHEDDAR BACON RANCH CHICKEN SNACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 115 MG | 94 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.7 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 323 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 573 MG | 500 MG |