EVAPORATED FILLED MILK vs SKIM MILK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKIM MILK wins in 6 out of 13 nutrient categories
EVAPORATED FILLED MILK: 4
vs
SKIM MILK: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EVAPORATED FILLED MILK | SKIM MILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 cal | 38 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 10 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EVAPORATED FILLED MILK | SKIM MILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 0.5 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | EVAPORATED FILLED MILK | SKIM MILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 200 MG | 125 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Phosphorus, P | 0 MG | 104 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 367 MG | 179 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 117 MG | 56 MG |