ENER-G EGG REPLACER vs COOKIE ICING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKIE ICING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
ENER-G EGG REPLACER: 2
vs
COOKIE ICING: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ENER-G EGG REPLACER | COOKIE ICING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 314 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 100 g | 80 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ENER-G EGG REPLACER | COOKIE ICING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ENER-G EGG REPLACER | COOKIE ICING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 2,550 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 25 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 125 MG | 200 MG |