EMERGE PLANT BASED MEATLESS GRIND vs NATURAL BISON CHUCK ROAST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
EMERGE PLANT BASED MEATLESS GRIND: 4
vs
NATURAL BISON CHUCK ROAST: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EMERGE PLANT BASED MEATLESS GRIND | NATURAL BISON CHUCK ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 195 cal | 115 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 4.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12.4 g | 3.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EMERGE PLANT BASED MEATLESS GRIND | NATURAL BISON CHUCK ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | EMERGE PLANT BASED MEATLESS GRIND | NATURAL BISON CHUCK ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.3 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 23 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 434 MG | 62 MG |