EMERALD vs CHOPPED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOPPED ALMONDS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
EMERALD: 3
vs
CHOPPED ALMONDS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EMERALD | CHOPPED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 567 cal | |
| Protein | 17.1 g | 23.3 g | |
| Carbs | 28.6 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 45.7 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 10 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EMERALD | CHOPPED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | EMERALD | CHOPPED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 57 MG | 300 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.1 MG | 3.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 800 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 571 MG | 0 MG |