EGG REPLACER vs HARD COOKED EGGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HARD COOKED EGGS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
EGG REPLACER: 4
vs
HARD COOKED EGGS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EGG REPLACER | HARD COOKED EGGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 350 cal | 136 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 13.6 g | |
| Carbs | 70 g | 2.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 9.1 g | |
| Fiber | 10 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EGG REPLACER | HARD COOKED EGGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | EGG REPLACER | HARD COOKED EGGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 30 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 150 MG | 125 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 3,200 MG | 80 MG |