EGG REPLACER vs HARD COOKED PEELED EGGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EGG REPLACER wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
EGG REPLACER: 3
vs
HARD COOKED PEELED EGGS: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | EGG REPLACER | HARD COOKED PEELED EGGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 83.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 16.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | EGG REPLACER | HARD COOKED PEELED EGGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | EGG REPLACER | HARD COOKED PEELED EGGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 333 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 2,500 MG | 0 MG |