DRESSING vs SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
DRESSING: 4
vs
SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DRESSING | SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 26.7 g | 43.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DRESSING | SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DRESSING | SUPER PLANT-BASED CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 33 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 33 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 900 MG | 700 MG |