DRESSING vs RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
DRESSING: 0
vs
RANCH DRESSING: 2
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 433 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 46.7 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 767 MG | 767 MG | Tie |