DRESSING vs LIGHT CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LIGHT CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
DRESSING: 2
vs
LIGHT CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DRESSING | LIGHT CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 10 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DRESSING | LIGHT CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DRESSING | LIGHT CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 117 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 900 MG | 1,000 MG |