DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING & DIP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRESSING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
DRESSING: 5
vs
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING & DIP: 0
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING & DIP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 30 g | 43.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING & DIP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 967 MG | 833 MG |