DRESSING vs SHENANDOAH VALLEY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
DRESSING: 3
vs
SHENANDOAH VALLEY: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DRESSING | SHENANDOAH VALLEY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 567 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fat | 60 g | 36.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DRESSING | SHENANDOAH VALLEY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DRESSING | SHENANDOAH VALLEY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 967 MG | 733 MG |