DRESSING vs PLANT BASED CAESAR DRESSING & MARINADE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
DRESSING: 3
vs
PLANT BASED CAESAR DRESSING & MARINADE: 2
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DRESSING | PLANT BASED CAESAR DRESSING & MARINADE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 53.3 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DRESSING | PLANT BASED CAESAR DRESSING & MARINADE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DRESSING | PLANT BASED CAESAR DRESSING & MARINADE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,200 MG | 767 MG |