DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
DRESSING: 2
vs
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 290 cal | 552 cal | |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 25.8 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 19.4 g | 58.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 581 MG | 724 MG |