DRESSING vs CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR DRESSING wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
DRESSING: 3
vs
CAESAR DRESSING: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 132 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 32.4 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 43.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 33 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 33 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 853 MG | 700 MG |