DRESSING vs SWEET RED WINE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
DRESSING: 4
vs
SWEET RED WINE: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DRESSING | SWEET RED WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 533 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DRESSING | SWEET RED WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DRESSING | SWEET RED WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 933 MG | 1,300 MG |