DRESSING vs REDUCED FAT DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
DRESSING: 3
vs
REDUCED FAT DRESSING: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DRESSING | REDUCED FAT DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 117 cal | 233 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 26.7 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 15 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DRESSING | REDUCED FAT DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | DRESSING | REDUCED FAT DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 233 MG | 1,000 MG |