DRESSING vs LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
DRESSING: 0
vs
LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DRESSING | LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 194 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.5 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DRESSING | LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DRESSING | LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 767 MG | 1,516 MG |