DECORATING ICING vs DRIZZLE TOPPING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DRIZZLE TOPPING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
DECORATING ICING: 0
vs
DRIZZLE TOPPING: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DECORATING ICING | DRIZZLE TOPPING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 195 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 71.4 g | 48.8 g | |
| Fat | 17.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DECORATING ICING | DRIZZLE TOPPING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DECORATING ICING | DRIZZLE TOPPING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 29 MG | 73 MG |