DECORATING ICING vs DECORATING SUGAR BLUE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DECORATING ICING wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
DECORATING ICING: 2
vs
DECORATING SUGAR BLUE: 1
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DECORATING ICING | DECORATING SUGAR BLUE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 417 cal | 417 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 100 g | |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DECORATING ICING | DECORATING SUGAR BLUE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 167 MG | 0 MG |