DECADENT FUDGE MINT COOKIES vs MAPLE COOKIE THINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MAPLE COOKIE THINS wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
DECADENT FUDGE MINT COOKIES: 2
vs
MAPLE COOKIE THINS: 6
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DECADENT FUDGE MINT COOKIES | MAPLE COOKIE THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 69.4 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 22.2 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DECADENT FUDGE MINT COOKIES | MAPLE COOKIE THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DECADENT FUDGE MINT COOKIES | MAPLE COOKIE THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3 MG | 1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 417 MG | 450 MG |