DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED THIN MINTS vs FUDGE MARSHMALLOW COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW COOKIES wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED THIN MINTS: 4
vs
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW COOKIES: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED THIN MINTS | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 448 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 80 g | 69.0 g | |
| Fat | 10 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED THIN MINTS | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 123 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 172 MG |