CRISPY RINGS vs ORIGINAL PORK CRACKLINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CRISPY RINGS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CRISPY RINGS: 4
vs
ORIGINAL PORK CRACKLINS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CRISPY RINGS | ORIGINAL PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 379 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 10.3 g | 50 g | |
| Carbs | 72.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 5.2 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CRISPY RINGS | ORIGINAL PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CRISPY RINGS | ORIGINAL PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 379 MG | 2,571 MG |