CRISPY MARSHMALLOW MINI BITES vs NATURAL DECADENCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL DECADENCE wins in 6 out of 13 nutrient categories
CRISPY MARSHMALLOW MINI BITES: 2
vs
NATURAL DECADENCE: 6
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CRISPY MARSHMALLOW MINI BITES | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 379 cal | 211 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 5.3 g | |
| Carbs | 75 g | 26.3 g | |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 10.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CRISPY MARSHMALLOW MINI BITES | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CRISPY MARSHMALLOW MINI BITES | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 70 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 446 MG | 105 MG |