CRISPY BATTER vs TUV TAAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CRISPY BATTER wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CRISPY BATTER: 5
vs
TUV TAAM: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CRISPY BATTER | TUV TAAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 225 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 10.8 g | 14.6 g | |
| Carbs | 15.8 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 13.3 g | 36.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CRISPY BATTER | TUV TAAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CRISPY BATTER | TUV TAAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 25 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 425 MG | 309 MG |