COTTON CANDY WITH MINI MARSHMALLOWS vs FRUIT SLIECS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FRUIT SLIECS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
COTTON CANDY WITH MINI MARSHMALLOWS: 0
vs
FRUIT SLIECS: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COTTON CANDY WITH MINI MARSHMALLOWS | FRUIT SLIECS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 389 cal | 349 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 94.4 g | 86.1 g | |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COTTON CANDY WITH MINI MARSHMALLOWS | FRUIT SLIECS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COTTON CANDY WITH MINI MARSHMALLOWS | FRUIT SLIECS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |