CORNED BEEF HASH vs 100% NATURAL WHITE & DARK IN WATER CHICKEN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
100% NATURAL WHITE & DARK IN WATER CHICKEN wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CORNED BEEF HASH: 4
vs
100% NATURAL WHITE & DARK IN WATER CHICKEN: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CORNED BEEF HASH | 100% NATURAL WHITE & DARK IN WATER CHICKEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 cal | 95 cal | |
| Protein | 7.6 g | 15.5 g | |
| Carbs | 9.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 10.2 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CORNED BEEF HASH | 100% NATURAL WHITE & DARK IN WATER CHICKEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CORNED BEEF HASH | 100% NATURAL WHITE & DARK IN WATER CHICKEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 226 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 424 MG | 357 MG |