COOKING WINE vs UME PLUM VINEGAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UME PLUM VINEGAR wins in 2 out of 7 nutrient categories
COOKING WINE: 0
vs
UME PLUM VINEGAR: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKING WINE | UME PLUM VINEGAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 83 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKING WINE | UME PLUM VINEGAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 633 MG | 8,400 MG |