COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP vs WILD ALASKAN POLLOCK FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP: 4
vs
WILD ALASKAN POLLOCK FILLETS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | WILD ALASKAN POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 94 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 21.2 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 0.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | WILD ALASKAN POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED TAIL-ON SHRIMP | WILD ALASKAN POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.2 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 223 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 224 MG | 94 MG |