COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP vs CHILEAN SEABASS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP wins in 8 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP: 8
vs
CHILEAN SEABASS: 0
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP | CHILEAN SEABASS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 200 cal | |
| Protein | 23.8 g | 15.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 14.7 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP | CHILEAN SEABASS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED TAIL OFF WHITE SHRIMP | CHILEAN SEABASS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 6 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 208 MG | 94 MG |