COOKED SMALL SHRIMP vs WILD-CAUGHT TEXAS GULF MEDIUM SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD-CAUGHT TEXAS GULF MEDIUM SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
COOKED SMALL SHRIMP: 3
vs
WILD-CAUGHT TEXAS GULF MEDIUM SHRIMP: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED SMALL SHRIMP | WILD-CAUGHT TEXAS GULF MEDIUM SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 53 cal | 118 cal | |
| Protein | 11.8 g | 22.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED SMALL SHRIMP | WILD-CAUGHT TEXAS GULF MEDIUM SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED SMALL SHRIMP | WILD-CAUGHT TEXAS GULF MEDIUM SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 91 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 165 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 671 MG | 941 MG |