COOKED SHRIMP WITH SAUCE vs BATTERED HADDOCK BITES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP WITH SAUCE wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
COOKED SHRIMP WITH SAUCE: 7
vs
BATTERED HADDOCK BITES: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED SHRIMP WITH SAUCE | BATTERED HADDOCK BITES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 80 cal | 196 cal | |
| Protein | 12.4 g | 9.8 g | |
| Carbs | 6.2 g | 17.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 9.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED SHRIMP WITH SAUCE | BATTERED HADDOCK BITES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED SHRIMP WITH SAUCE | BATTERED HADDOCK BITES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 157 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 540 MG | 343 MG |