COOKED SHRIMP RING vs TILAPIA FILLETS BONELESS SKINLESS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP RING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKED SHRIMP RING: 5
vs
TILAPIA FILLETS BONELESS SKINLESS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED SHRIMP RING | TILAPIA FILLETS BONELESS SKINLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 88 cal | 88 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 14.2 g | 18.6 g | |
| Carbs | 5.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED SHRIMP RING | TILAPIA FILLETS BONELESS SKINLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 43 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 133 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 602 MG | 40 MG |