COOKED SHRIMP RING vs HADDOCK WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP RING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKED SHRIMP RING: 5
vs
HADDOCK WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS FILLETS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED SHRIMP RING | HADDOCK WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 88 cal | 53 cal | |
| Protein | 14.2 g | 11.5 g | |
| Carbs | 5.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED SHRIMP RING | HADDOCK WILD CAUGHT SKINLESS FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 43 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 133 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 602 MG | 434 MG |