COOKED SHRIMP vs PATAGONIAN SCALLOPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKED SHRIMP: 4
vs
PATAGONIAN SCALLOPS: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED SHRIMP | PATAGONIAN SCALLOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 59 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 14.1 g | 12.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED SHRIMP | PATAGONIAN SCALLOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED SHRIMP | PATAGONIAN SCALLOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 435 MG | 389 MG |