COOKED SHRIMP vs WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
COOKED SHRIMP: 5
vs
WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED SHRIMP | WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 27.4 g | 15.0 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED SHRIMP | WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED SHRIMP | WILD ALASKA FLOUNDER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 179 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 301 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 226 MG | 106 MG |