COOKED SHRIMP vs BATTERED HADDOCK BITES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
COOKED SHRIMP: 5
vs
BATTERED HADDOCK BITES: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED SHRIMP | BATTERED HADDOCK BITES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 82 cal | 196 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 9.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 17.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 9.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED SHRIMP | BATTERED HADDOCK BITES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED SHRIMP | BATTERED HADDOCK BITES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 47 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 157 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 341 MG | 343 MG |