COOKED SHRIMP vs WILD ALASKA POLLOCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD ALASKA POLLOCK wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
COOKED SHRIMP: 4
vs
WILD ALASKA POLLOCK: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED SHRIMP | WILD ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 59 cal | |
| Protein | 27.4 g | 11.8 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED SHRIMP | WILD ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED SHRIMP | WILD ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 179 MG | 15 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 160 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 226 MG | 329 MG |