COOKED SHRIMP vs WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
COOKED SHRIMP: 7
vs
WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED SHRIMP | WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 119 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 22.6 g | 11 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 26 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 11 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED SHRIMP | WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED SHRIMP | WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 95 MG | 20 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 220 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 964 MG | 470 MG |