COOKED MEDIUM SHRIMP vs SKINLESS BONELESS WILD CAUGHT COD FILLET PORTIONS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED MEDIUM SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
COOKED MEDIUM SHRIMP: 4
vs
SKINLESS BONELESS WILD CAUGHT COD FILLET PORTIONS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED MEDIUM SHRIMP | SKINLESS BONELESS WILD CAUGHT COD FILLET PORTIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 59 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 14.1 g | 15.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED MEDIUM SHRIMP | SKINLESS BONELESS WILD CAUGHT COD FILLET PORTIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED MEDIUM SHRIMP | SKINLESS BONELESS WILD CAUGHT COD FILLET PORTIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 47 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 232 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 435 MG | 304 MG |