COOKED MEDIUM SHRIMP vs UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED MEDIUM SHRIMP wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKED MEDIUM SHRIMP: 3
vs
UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED MEDIUM SHRIMP | UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 53 cal | 53 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 11.8 g | 13.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED MEDIUM SHRIMP | UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED MEDIUM SHRIMP | UNCOOKED COLOSSAL SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 671 MG | 646 MG |