COOKED HAM vs BRISTOL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BRISTOL wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKED HAM: 1
vs
BRISTOL: 2
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED HAM | BRISTOL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 179 cal | 161 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 16.1 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | Tie |
| Fat | 12.5 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED HAM | BRISTOL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED HAM | BRISTOL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,107 MG | 1,000 MG |