COOKED HAM vs DIETZ & WATSON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DIETZ & WATSON wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKED HAM: 2
vs
DIETZ & WATSON: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED HAM | DIETZ & WATSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 86 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 19.0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED HAM | DIETZ & WATSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED HAM | DIETZ & WATSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 786 MG | 655 MG |