COOKED BRATWURST vs BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED BRATWURST wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKED BRATWURST: 5
vs
BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED BRATWURST | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 265 cal | 304 cal | |
| Protein | 16.8 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 22.1 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED BRATWURST | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED BRATWURST | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 575 MG | 982 MG |