COOKED BRATWURST vs SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED BRATWURST wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKED BRATWURST: 4
vs
SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED BRATWURST | SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 246 cal | 316 cal | |
| Protein | 14.9 g | 8.8 g | |
| Carbs | 2.6 g | 8.8 g | |
| Fat | 19.3 g | 28.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED BRATWURST | SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED BRATWURST | SKINLESS BUN-LENGTH CLASSIC FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 70 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 728 MG | 1,193 MG |