COOKED BRATWURST vs ANGUS BUN LENGTH UNCURED BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ANGUS BUN LENGTH UNCURED BEEF FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
COOKED BRATWURST: 3
vs
ANGUS BUN LENGTH UNCURED BEEF FRANKS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED BRATWURST | ANGUS BUN LENGTH UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 348 cal | 320 cal | |
| Protein | 13.6 g | 12 g | |
| Carbs | 3.0 g | 2 g | |
| Fat | 30.3 g | 28 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED BRATWURST | ANGUS BUN LENGTH UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 7.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED BRATWURST | ANGUS BUN LENGTH UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 30 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 833 MG | 700 MG |