CONDIMENTED ANNATTO PASTE vs CHICKEN SLOW COOKER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CONDIMENTED ANNATTO PASTE wins in 3 out of 7 nutrient categories
CONDIMENTED ANNATTO PASTE: 3
vs
CHICKEN SLOW COOKER: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CONDIMENTED ANNATTO PASTE | CHICKEN SLOW COOKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 185 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 35 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CONDIMENTED ANNATTO PASTE | CHICKEN SLOW COOKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 2,800 MG | 9,571 MG |