COLUMBUS vs BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COLUMBUS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
COLUMBUS: 4
vs
BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COLUMBUS | BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COLUMBUS | BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COLUMBUS | BONELESS FULLY COOKED HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,643 MG | 1,429 MG |