COLOSSAL SHRIMP vs WILD CAUGHT SNAPPER SKIN-ON FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
COLOSSAL SHRIMP: 4
vs
WILD CAUGHT SNAPPER SKIN-ON FILLETS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COLOSSAL SHRIMP | WILD CAUGHT SNAPPER SKIN-ON FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 97 cal | |
| Protein | 13.4 g | 20.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COLOSSAL SHRIMP | WILD CAUGHT SNAPPER SKIN-ON FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COLOSSAL SHRIMP | WILD CAUGHT SNAPPER SKIN-ON FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 54 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.2 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 416 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 571 MG | 66 MG |