COLESLAW DRESSING vs CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR DRESSING wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
COLESLAW DRESSING: 1
vs
CAESAR DRESSING: 6
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COLESLAW DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 103 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.7 g | |
| Carbs | 23.3 g | 10 g | |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COLESLAW DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COLESLAW DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 13 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 23 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 567 MG | 957 MG |